News

Global Jihad to Congress’ role: 16 things J Nandakumar said about the 1921 Malabar massacre of Hindus by Moplah Muslims

The so-called secularist Congress glorified the Khilafat movement as a part of Bharatiya’s struggle for Independence, said that RSS Pracharak, adding that the eminent Congress leaders propagated that the Khilafat movement was one where Hindus and Muslims fought together to oust the British, later, due to some distortions, riots occurred.

J Nandakumar, the all-Bharat convenor of Prajna Pravah, an organisation affiliated with the RSS, speaking during a program hosted by the Youtube channel Panchjanya in the centenary year of the infamous Moplah Massacre, a forgotten chapter of Bharat’s history, said that the communist historians and Islamist history writers who have tried to distort and mis represent Bharatiya history, have also glorified this massacre, depicting it as a freedom struggle.

Congress and the Communist government in Kerala paying pensions to the Moplah rioters: J Nandakumar

Until today, attempts are being made to depict the 1921 brutal Hindu genocide as a freedom struggle. The Congress and the Communist government in Kerala have gone to the extent of hailing the Moplah rioters by giving them the title of ‘freedom fighters’ and ‘martyrs’ and also providing pension to the Jihadist elements who fanned the bloodbath, said Nandakumar, adding that the Communist government has been using taxpayers money to pay pensions to these mass murderers.

Bharat convener of Prajna Pravah said that on the completion of 100 years of the infamous 1921 Malabar massacre of Hindus by Moplah Muslims, it becomes imperative to understand the historical background of the Hindu genocide carried out by Moplah Muslim fanatics demanding a Caliphate in Malabar.

Pan-Islamic movement that swept the world in the twentieth century has resurfaced

“Many people ask me why I think it’s necessary to dig up the skeletons after 100 years. Firstly, there is a saying that if you do not understand history you are doomed to repeat it, so it is important to understand the historical background of the incident. Secondly, we have seen how fundamentalist, communalist and Islamic terrorist elements have engaged in acts of violence and terrorism throughout the world. The pan-Islamic movement that swept the world in the twentieth century has resurfaced”, said J Nandakumar.

He further added that if one considers the International scenario, the Islamist fundamentalists all over the world have declared Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan as their ‘only hope’ and have used Turkey as the epicentre for spreading terrorism. Many Islamic organisations operating in Bharat like the Popular Front of Bharat (PFI) or the Jamaat-e-Islami or the ones trying to create unrest in Jammu and Kashmir have openly given statements recognizing Erdogan as their leader.

Islamists promoting ‘Khilafat 2.0’
He also mentioned how programs to promote ‘Khilafat 2.0’ are being held in higher educational institutions in various places. Many of you must have observed how placards and banners promoting Khilafat 2.0 had appeared during anti-CAA programs and processions organised in various places including Kerala, Jammu and Kashmir, Karnataka, Delhi etc.

PFI rally in Kerala parades chained people dressed in RSS uniform, depict the Moplah massacre of Hindus

The RSS Pracharak remembers how the Popular Front of Bhart (PFI), an extremist Islamist organization, chose to do a rally in Kerala parading men dressed in RSS uniforms, depict the Moplah massacre of Hindus.

OpIndia, on February 19, 2021, had reported about the incident. The rally was held in Tenhipalam town in Malappuram district of Kerala. The Popular Front of Bharat (PFI) had paraded men dressed in RSS uniforms. The men being paraded were also chained. The audio and visuals from the rally had confirmed a lot of Islamic chanting, including Allahu Akbar, la ilaha illallah Muhammad Rasulullah, and others chanted during the procession.

Islamist fanatics trying to spearhead another incident similar to the 1921 Moplah massacre: J Nandakumar

J Nandakumar revealed how during that procession carried out by PFI in Kerala, one chant which could be heard persistently and loudly was: “humne jo talwar uthaya tha 1921 mein, woh humne samundar mein feka nahi abhi bhi humare haath mein hain”, roughly translated as “the swords we picked up in 1921 was not thrown away in the oceans, it is still in our hands”.

What does this mean? It only goes on to suggest that these Islamist fanatics are trying to spearhead another incident similar to the 1921 Moplah massacre.

Kerala- the epicenter of Jihad

Thirdly, why it becomes important to understand the history of the Moplah riots is that many Islamic fundamentalists are trying to spread all sorts of jihad in the country. From ‘love jihad’ to ‘land jihad’ to ‘food jihad’ to ‘narcotics jihad’, the fanatics are doing everything in their capacity to spread such hate campaigns across the country.

J Nandakumar added how recently Bishop Mar Joseph Kallarangatt of the Pala diocese of the Syro-Malabar Church has stated that young Christian boys and girls of Kerala are being targeted for not just ‘Love Jihad’ but for ‘Narcotics Jihad’ too.

The recruitment into ISIS is also on the rise in our country. Along with this, there is this latest development in Kabul where the Islamic fundamentalists are at the helm of affairs. The RSS activist raised concerns that several analysts have warned that now Pakistan with the tactical support of the Taliban would again try and spread terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir.

All of the foregoing data were necessary to explain because they are the result of the blunders committed by the Hindu or the nationalist society during the 1921 Moplah Massacre, lamented J Nandakumar. They did not muster the courage to fight back against the Islamist fanatics and the result was that the estimated Hindu deaths of the ethnic cleansing in the Moplah massacre tantamounted to somewhere around 10,000 and it is believed that as many a 100,000 Hindus were forced to leave Kerala in the wake of the riots.

What happened in 1921 has a long history

The so-called Moplah Rebellion or the Khilaf movement, as believed by a lot of people, did not happen suddenly. What happened in 1921 has a long history. Though a lot of cities like Kanpur, Kolkata were affected, Kerala bore the worst brunt of the Khilafat movement’s ill effects.

J Nandakumar asserted that the beginning of Islamic terrorism in Kerala dates back to 1766 when the Islamic tyrant Hyder Ali conquered Mysore. Conflicts between Muslims and non-Muslims started during his regime. After Hyder Ali, his son Tipu Sultan carried on the legacy.

Tipu Sultan’s atrocities led to the mass exodus of Hindus from Malabar

Tipu Sultan was one of the most ruthless Islamic invaders in South Bharat. There have been several recorded instances of Tipu’s army forcefully converting, raping and kidnapping Hindus on his orders. Many temples are recorded to have been demolished under his reign. It was under his regime that many Hindus were driven away from Malabar.

Delving into the past, J Nandakumar further informed how mass Hindus exodus from Malabar was carried out. Half the Hindus dwelling in Malabar in Kerala fleed leaving behind all their wealth and property, so that they could save their life and dignity. Mass conversions and murders were carried out. Several Hindu women were brutally raped and assaulted.

Moplah Muslims became landlords by acquiring huge swathes of land and property left behind by the Malabar Hindus

The army of Tipu Sultan, who harboured extreme animosity for the local Hindus and tribals in the area, ruthlessly hacked Hindu men, women and children to death. After killing, the bodies of Hindu men, women and children were dumped in the river. Fearing death, half of the Hindu population flee Malabar, leaving behind an immense expanse of fertile lands. The best quality of teak in the world was cultivated on these large swathes of land which the Hindus just left behind.

Tipu Sultan distributed all these lands in between the Moplah Muslims. The Muslims who then after acquiring such large masses of land, became the zamindars or the landlords and established their supremacy in Malabar and the other Northern parts of Kerala.

Between 1792 to 1921 Malabar witnessed as many as 82 large scale anti-Hindu riots

Then in 1792 Tipu Sultan lost and he had to leave Malabar. During that time, the majority of Hindus who had fled came back and reclaimed their land that was illegally distributed amongst the Moplah Muslims by the Islamic invader. This incident profoundly affected the psyche of the people of Malabar and the rift between Muslims and non-Muslims, especially Hindus began to widen.

After 1792, the spate of communal violence in Malabar increased. From 1792 to 1921 Malabar witnessed as many as 82 large scale anti-Hindu riots. The Hindu genocide in Malabar in 1972 was a continuation of the series of carnage that began in 1792.

Congress purposely ignored the brewing anti-Hindu sentiment to spearhead the Khilafat movement

Here, J Nandakumar remarked that Congress extended its support to the Khilafat movement without trying to grasp its impact. He blamed Congress leaders for dismissing the sensitivity of the circumstance and ignoring the obvious hatred against the Hindu Kafirs thriving in the hearts of the Moplah Muslims.

He said that it was obvious that the Moplah Muslims in Malabar were always ready to attack the Hindus, with or without any reason, still, the congress gave a green signal to the Khilafat movement. The Congress provided the Moplah fanatics with a reason, under the grab of the Khilafat movement, to wreak havoc and indulge in the mass murder of innocent Hindus.

After Congress joined hands with Khilafat leaders Malabar witnessed the first gruesome attack on Hindus

In 1920 an alliance was made between Khilafat leaders and the Bharatiya National Congress and on August 20, 1921, Malabar witnessed the first gruesome attack by the Moplah Muslim community on the innocent Hindus.

The protagonist of this Islamist project, Kunjahammed Haji by spearheading the Khilafat movement, established Al-Daula (Islamic State) where he imposed jizya (religious tax) on the Hindus of his territory.

Congress glorified the Khilafat movement as a part of Bharatiya’s struggle for Independence

The so-called secularist Congress glorified the Khilafat movement as a part of Bharatiya’s struggle for Independence, said that RSS Pracharak, adding that the eminent Congress leaders propagated that the Khilafat movement was one where Hindus and Muslims fought together to oust the British, later, due to some distortions, riots occurred. This is what Congress has been proclaiming, but, the reality is far from what Congress wanted people to believe. “It was not started as an Independence struggle”, asserted the piqued RSS activist.

Irrespective of what Congress said, the fact is that it started as a part of a pan Islamic movement.

J Nandakumar goes on to further discuss the intrinsic nature of these particular sets of Moplah fanatics. They are terrorists driven by extremist ideologies, said the RSS Pracharak.

The seeds of the Khilafat movement were sown during World War One

Trying to establish how old and deep-rooted is the hydra of Islamism in Bharat, J Nandakumar informed that on September 1, 1914, Mappila leaders of Malabar assembled at Himayathul Islam Sabha Hall and appealed to the community members to join hands with Britain. Before the First World War, David Lloyd George, British prime minister (1916–22) had given a clarion call asking Muslims to support Britain in World War 1 and in return he had promised to keep the Khilafat, the fight for the Caliph of Islam, alive.

Then the Muslims all over Bharat, especially in Kerala had offered prayers in each mosque for the success of the British.

The British, however, were more cunning. After their victory, they dismantled Turkey’s Ottoman Empire and declared many regions as independent states. They restored Hagia Sophia as a Christian sanctuary.

This led to the birth of the Khilafat movement which was launched by Bharatiya Muslims to support the preserve the authority of the Ottoman Sultan as Caliph of Islam following the breakup of the Ottoman Empire at the end of the war.

What happened at the Thuvoor well that led to 38 Hindus being slaughtered by Muslim fanatics during the Moplah genocide

Talking about what has gone down the history as the Hindu Genocide day, J Nandakumar reminisced how on the black day of 25th of September 1921, on the barren hillside between Thuvoor and Karuvayakandi in North Kerala Chambrassery Imbichi Koithangal, one of the Khilafat leaders, held a rally with over 4,000 of his followers. During this meeting, more than 40 Hindus were caught hold of and taken to him with their hands tied behind their backs. 38 were murdered. 3 of the 38 were shot but the rest were beheaded and thrown in the Thuvoor well.

He added that Annie Besant, who had visited Malabar, chronicled one such act of brutality on a Hindu pregnant woman who was so brutally murdered that her body lay on the street with her stomach hacked open by a sword with the unborn foetus strewn outside the woman’s body. 

To foil the attempt to whitewash the 1921 Moplah massacre the truth should be revealed

J Nandakumar, near the end of the event, discusses how critical it is for the Moplah Massacre, which has been largely forgotten, to be brought to light. He suggested that Hindus come out in large numbers to show their solidarity for the countless Hindus who have been massacred and their descendants who have yet to recover from their losses. The reality behind the so-called Moplah Rebellion must be revealed, as must, the Islamist apologists’ attempt to whitewash the Islamist jihadist Moplahs’ carnage, said J Nandakumar.

It may be noted that while speaking in the same program, the Uttar Pradesh CM Yogi Adityanath had also slammed that left historians who have been whitewashing the 1921 Malabar genocide of Hindus as a peasant uprising.

This incident serves as a grim reminder of how Jihadi elements have shamed mankind. We must give serious consideration to how Bharat might be liberated from such Jihadist ideology, said Yogi Adityanath.

Even 100 years after the horrific 1921 Moplah massacre, the wounds of one of the bloodiest communal pogroms documented in Bharatiya history remain fresh in the Hindu psyche. OpIndia has published a detailed report on the Moplah genocide of Hindus and 25th September 1921, the day when 38 Hindus were slaughtered and thrown in a well by a Muslim mob demanding a Caliphate in Malabar. The report can be viewed here.

Read More
News

“Rejecting the Colonial Narrative of North-South Divide is our National Duty”: J Nandakumar

I’m optimistic about NRC. If you have Aadhaar, ration card, or any other I-card, it’s well and good: J Nandakumar
Recently, Kesari Weekly and Prajna Pravah came together to organise a full-day conclave called Bridging South. What was the intent behind this? And how should we see the entire debate? Organiser Editor Prafulla Ketkar in conversation with J Nandakumar, National Convener, Prajna Pravah on the North-South Divide

In recent days, there have been many discussions about, the southern part of Bharat, whether it is different from the northern part, politically, economically and otherwise. And though the discussion is not new, it has got a new twist post-elections. Just before that, there was a conference in Kerala called “Cutting South” and with the support of some Canadian institutions there, since then, has been a discussion about the United States of South Bhart and how the South is different from the North.

It’s actually when we are talking about bridging south, I would like to translate it in a different way that it is to say Setu Himachal itself means bridging the north to south. From time immemorial Bharat is described as the country that lies north of the ocean, and south of the snowy mountains, for there dwelt the descendants of Bharat. From Himalaya to Hindu Maha Sagar. That is Bharat’s two boundaries and it has not been told only by someone who is living in the northern part of Bharat, but the whole part, especially from the South. This description is in ancient scriptures of Malayalam, Tamil, Telugu, and Kannada everywhere.

But we are also aware of those colonial masters, especially the English people who ruled us and how they tried to divide, tried to make a divide between North and South. They always believed in divide and then rule and that notorious and divisive poisonous action taken by English people is shamelessly replicated by Bharatiya Governments or the political parties who do not believe in the cultural unity and integrity of Bharat. This is also being followed by many of the congress leaders. Earlier Mahatma Gandhiji, Lokmanya Tilak and Baba Saheb Ambedkar, all firmly believed that Bharat was one. Baba Saheb Ambedkar presented a wonderful statement on the integrity of Bharat at Columbia University in 1916. He said that Bharat was not a geographical unity alone. It’s an indisputable cultural unity from end to end. And about Bhagwan Ram’s effort to bridge the North and South; Sri Krishna’s efforts to connect the East to the West and how Bhagwan Shiva is in every grain of Bharat. We had political unity too as seen in the Chola Dynasty, and Maurya Dynasty, under the rules of Asoka and Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj. But the ultimate thing was always cultural unity. But the congres leaders, who are against the Gandhian principles or those of Tilak and Lal Shastri don’t believe in this cultural unity.

Another group of people who have succumbed to the divisive policy are leftists. They started this type of narrative and recently its ugly face has come to the fore. That’s what happened in this confer.

“From Himalaya to Hindu Maha Sagar. That is Bharat’s two boundaries and it has not been told only by someone who is living in the northern part of Bharat, but the whole part, especially from the South”

Both of them come together to prove that the southern part of Bharat was never a part of Bharat and it is something different. And along with that, they have put forward so many fake narratives regarding the central neglecting South, and how most of the revenue is collected from the South and no development is not going on there.

But now because of this fake narrative forcefully pushed it is our duty or national duty that we must come together and tell the world how Bharat is one, how the South is connected to Bharat, how the South is connected to Bharat, how the greatest personalities like Shankaracharya and all tried for the unity of Bharat.

That’s why Prajna Pravah, Kesari Daily and others decided to put together this conclave titled Bridging South or Setu Himachal.

Initially when it started during the colonial period, as you mentioned, it was mainly around linguistic differentiation between Dravidian languages and Indo-Aryan languages. And we have seen a strong linguistic nationalism in Tamil Nadu. But what we see now, like in the 1960s sixties, sentiments being raised for political ends. Of course, fortunately, they didn’t get much traction among common people and we managed to maintain our unity and integrity. But what we are seeing now is much more poisonous because we know all for sure that there will be you know, census followed by delimitation, and GST-related issues. So, the discussion is being raised around this idea of cooperating federalism. So how should we see all this?

See our diversity was not made of opposing factors, but mutually complementary ones. So what we are seeing in this great land of thousands and thousands of years of history is a multi-layered culture This is not a multicultural, it is a multi-layered culture. That is the speciality of Bharat. Those who believe in Western material thought or ideology, could not comprehend this multi-layered nature of Bharat or Bharat’s culture. They are just saying this, this is multicultural and see, for example, there are different languages. How can Bharat’s language be so different? Because it is a language be so different? Because it is a language continuum, the whole Bharat. From the Kanya Kumari to Kashmir. All languages are part of one single family through linguistic basic definitions, if you go through the science of language. For example, when you are constructing a sentence, there is a subject-object and a verb. This is the same pattern, common to all Bhartiya languages. Also, the words from Malayalam to what you say Hindi or Kashmiri or any other language have similarities in words.

I would like to say one is the languages we are using for our interview is English and another one is Urdu. This is in one way or another, the purity of our languages has been adulterated or intervened by these two language influences. This type was created by the colonial masters, right from the beginning, when they wanted to create that division, they wanted some basis and they started saying that this language families are different on that basis.

They created the Aryan-Dravidian division and to support they want more divisions so that they have through their census.

And today we are seeing just the repeating of those divisive measures created by the colonial British Masters, by the parties or the ideologies which do not believe in Bharat’s ancient nature, cultura unity, and cultural integrity. They want to divide, as they know that a United Bharat cannot be ruled by them, they cannot comprehend it as a whole. So, they want to create this division and they thinking that if “Nagaland Mange Azadi”, “Kerala Mange Azadi”, “Kerala is different from Nagaland” and the so-called mainland of Bharat, they can rule it forever and they can become the Chakravortis of that land but they are in a fool’s paradise.

Recently, they have started a new game –this census issue and all and I’m not a political expert but one thing is for sure, the recent five assembly elections have given a thrashing to these narratives. But we have heard how Martin Luther King Jr also said that it is not because of the bad people’s number, they are they are in the minority, that they make more noise, but because the good people remain silent.

See this integrationist view of Bharat as a counter to the divisive view that has been there even during the freedom Struggle and in the last 75 years. But if we see the present generation, the youth who are educated in the present system, and not much connected to our roots in day-to-day life, they see this reality that there is a lot of migration from the northern part to the south. How should we explain reality related to economics and migration development, so-called development parameters and then engage with the youth from the integration point of view?
See it’s a fact that from the north, especially from Bihar and the eastern part of Bharat, many job seekers are coming to the south, especially to Kerala. But the same thing is true of many metros of Bharat –Delhi, Mumbai, Ahmedabad—they are full of people from the South.

Or go to Gulf countries, the maximum number of people who are doing so many ordinary jobs are from Kerala. So, it is a fact this type of mutual migration is there and because of the trade union aspect and the hike of the day-to-day salary, Kerala attracts a lot more labour. That’s why you know that this type of trade unionism in agriculture and industry has badly affected Kerala. If you analyse it economically, there is no new industry in Kerala. The staple food of rice is not being cultivated in Kerala. The Keralites depend on the rice cultivated by the Andhra people. Kerala people are celebrating at the expense of Tamils who are cultivating flowers. Why is it happening? So because of this militant trade unionism put forward by or led by these communist people and shamelessly followed by the Kerala trade unionists because they want to fight with them. So, they also demanded much more. And because of that one thing, one thing happened there in.

Kerala, new industry is not coming. Agriculture has been destroyed.

One factory is there the remaining industry or the construction works for the construction work and all the daily labour charges or the salary is high. Bihari people or Bengal people, are seeing that Kerala is their girl because they are getting more salary. But the mentality of the ordinary people who are living there in Kerala is not ready to do this type of work. They do the very same work in the Gulf, they do the very same work in Gujarat. So another thing, the so-called analysts or the so-called great, what do you say of the North or the other area or the leftist? They are just to pick and choose.

Only when just after this election, I came across one of the great leftist journalist’s analyses about the per capita income of Kerala and the per capita income of Bihar. I am just asking why don’t you compare it with Haryana or Gujarat? The correct picture has to be put in front of the youth.

And there has been a history to it because compared to the north the southern states didn’t experience that kind of Islamic invasion for such a long period. The Southern part experienced the European invasion in an earlier phase, but compared to that the eastern part has seen the British rule for a longer period. So all these factors have contributed to post-independent Bharatiya’s development scenario.

But another aspect is the involvement of the academia, all of sudden certain maps are coming out, certain theories coming out, and certain people even sitting in European academia working on the idea of the so-called United States of South Bharat. So it is not just about programs. It is the strong academia and media that support this kind of narrative which leads to this kind of divide.

So, is there any plan to take up research, and academic work from this integration point of view, on how we have been culturally the same?

That’s also needed. It’s the need of the hour. I would like to say one thing just to analyse after one election because some result came out against some particular party, we can’t come to just any conclusion. It is a knee-jerk reaction. A knee-jerk reaction from the parties who are against this unity of Bharat. That’s why they are trying to create such fake narratives. Another aspect is that a United Bharat, especially for the last 9-10 years, which is progressing like anything in the economic field and even the cultural aspect through Shri Ram Janmbhoomi etc. is making people nervous.

“Many nations are considering Bharat as their potential leader. the so-called developed nations including China are very much afraid of this type of progress and development happening in Bharat and they want to divide Bharat and make it weak”

Prajna Pravah is taking it seriously, not only inside Bharat, we are now trying to create an atmosphere all over the world, at universities also in the coming times. A huge outreach program has also the Bharatiya knowledge system aspect is being given much importance. We have to have more such programs along with proper rigorous research, content generation and outreach programs.

Now there seems to be another dimension which is very critical politically that has been added to this entire discourse that sees South Bharatiya as free of Hindutva and anti-Sanatan.

This is very interesting because most of the Sanatan traditions, temples, and temple architecture are all in the south of Bharatiya. Besides this of course the political arguments over it – how BJP has some vote share or whether RSS has any presence in Tamil Nadu or not.

See just to go through the history of Bharat. In the southern part of Bharat, of course, the colonial invasion happened first in the South, but in the later period, the South never faced such a great onslaught as the eastern part of the Bharata faced. Of course, the Islamic invasion also happened in the North, especially the Northwest area, especially later on a whole part of the North.

I think my conclusion regarding this religious belief as far as you have mentioned is a Dharma concept, I would like to say the religious aspect of Hindutva is very strong in Bharat and the South personally. That’s why in Sabarimala or Tirupati, lots of people are conve converging together. But maybe my inference or conclusion is that the North because of these continuous attacks, developed the nationalist aspect of Hindutva strongly in the North.

Also looking back, we never supported dictatorship, but it happened in Bharat from 1975 to 77. But against that politically, everyone fought, but, Kerala, which is being posed as the most illiterate politically aware and liberal society, voted maximum to that dictator after an emergency.

My point is that yes, Dharma at the personal level or the religious framework, is very strong in the south, but as far as the nationalist spirit is concerned, in the north of Bharat one can see it more.

So again, during the Ram Janambhoomi agitation, even though it had a religious fervour the North also saw Rama as a nationalist leader and the agitation as a Rama versus Babur –an evil foreign invader thing. Also, one can’t say that the North is becoming more saffron and the South is less. That aspect is also not correct. That all keeps changing.

And change is happening…the people of the South are also understanding the comprehensive meaning of Hindutva.

Read More
News

I’m optimistic about NRC. If you have Aadhaar, ration card, or any other I-card, it’s well and good: J Nandakumar

National Convenor of Prajna Pravah J Nandakumar says BJP has never kept plans for CAA, NRC secret, insists RSS shakhas have no link to party in power, explains Sangh’s concept behind calling all Bharatiya Hindu, and argues it is wrong to say RSS hasn’t changed with times As protests over the Citizenship (Amendment) Act spread, senior RSS leader J Nandakumar argues in his new book, Hindutva for the Changing Times, that Babasaheb Ambedkar would have been “happy to see the passage of the Bill”. The book also assesses contemporary issues “in light of Hindutva”.
National convenor of the RSS-affiliated think-tank Prajna Pravah, a forum for ‘nationalist’ thinkers, Nandakumar has been at the centre of what the organisation calls its attempts to “decolonise Bharatiya minds from Eurocentric impact” through academic rigour. In the past, he has spoken out against “CPM aggression” in Kerala.

ANANTHAKRISHNAN G: What prompted you to write Hindutva for the Changing Times?

The book is a compilation of write-ups and articles based on the Hindutva paradigm. I tried my best to address and analyse the philosophical aspects of Hindutva darshan. I am using the word ‘darshan’ because I am not quite sure if the book is a true description of the philosophy (of Hindutva). I have tried to analyse the contemporary issues which we, and humanity as a whole, are facing, and attempted to answer some of the major questions before us. For example, the political turmoil, environmental issues, multiculturalism, the so-called liberalism, the industry 2.0 or the technological advancements… I have tried to touch upon the hot subjects of the modern era.

National Convenor of Prajna Pravah J Nandakumar with Senior Assistant Editor Ananthakrishnan G in The Bharatiya Express newsroom. (Express Photo: Abhinav Saha)

It is, of course, necessary for us to progress, but along with that, some vested interests are trying to get all our data and based on that are creating algorithms to control our emotions. So not just trade or economics, but even your emotions are being controlled. So that’s the purpose of the book, to look at some of these issues through the Hindutva paradigm or with the help of the Hindutva light.

ANANTHAKRISHNAN G: Your book also comes at a time when there are protests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act. You have touched upon the subject in your book, and have also said that B R Ambedkar would approve of the law. Can you elaborate?

The enactment of the CAA is, in some way, a fulfillment of Babasaheb Ambedkar’s dream. That’s my conviction. Someone who has sincerely gone through his thoughts on Pakistan, his observations on Partition, will surely agree with my statement. He has clearly stated the difficulties that Hindus, especially Hindu Dalits, the minorities in Pakistan, are facing. The Hindus of Pakistan cannot exist peacefully there. They will face total annihilation, especially the Dalits of Pakistan. So his suggestion for that grey question was… his famous statement, that populations should be transferred. He quoted the Greece-Turkey agreement of 1923. There was a big issue over minorities in both the countries, and they settled it through a transfer of population. (As part of the Treaty of Lausanne, the two countries agreed to uproot two million people in a population exchange. Only since the 1990s have people been able to visit what they see as their ancestral villages.) I am not saying that transfer of population happened at the time. That is not my point, but what Ambedkar said at that time, in due course, history proved him correct. What is the plight of minorities, especially the Hindus there (in Pakistan)? At one point, there were 20% Hindus there, now that number has reduced to 1%. The promises that were made by Liyaqat Ali Khan on behalf of Pakistan to Jawaharlal Nehru have not been met. In fact we have actually kept our promises and the minorities here have flourished in all aspects. The CAA was not an issue when I wrote the book, but in the present context (what I wrote) holds relevance. That is what I said.

LIZ MATHEW: But the CAA and National Register of Citizens (NRC) are no longer Muslim issues, they have become national issues…

Firstly, the CAA is not a discriminatory Act. It is an inclusive Act as far as I am concerned; it’s against discrimination that minorities face in (Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan). It was a dream not only of Ambedkar but also Mahatma Gandhiji. It was a promise made by Jawaharlal Nehru… The NRC is a promise made by our constitutional heads, our government.

Also, while the CAA has been passed, where is the NRC? I am not saying that the NRC will not come, but why is there agitation and rioting against the NRC? The rules, regulations, legalities, and modalities have not been finalised. Still, some people are campaigning against it and creating havoc.

A caricature of National Convenor of Prajna Pravah J Nandakumar.

Also, any agitation will have all sorts of religious representation. However, that does not mean 100% Hindus, Muslims, and Christians are against it. This is not a fact. And where is this agitation going on now, please tell me. I am coming from the Northeast, I was in Manipur, I didn’t see any agitation there. In Jamia Millia (Islamia University) agitation, there were specific slogans on the Northeast, but the people of the Northeast are out on the roads in support of the CAA. Huge programmes are going on, lakhs of people are participating. Now whether it is being covered in Delhi or not, that is a different thing. Some selective reporting is also being done by a section of the media. That is creating misunderstanding.

LIZ MATHEW: But the Home Minister spoke about chronology and said the CAA will be followed by the NRC. That is why people are making the link.

The Home Minister has said that in due course the NRC will be… The plan is there, you can submit your ideas, what your problems are… You can raise them before the government when the modalities and legalities are being formulated. We can come up with a solution. See, the CAA and NRC are not a secret thing. It has been in the public domain since 2016.

“There are many points behind considering a person a refugee — religion, language, class… One serious issue people are facing has been taken into account in CAA. Other classification can be made in due course,” J Nandakumar said.

ABANTIKA GHOSH: But why make religion a criteria for CAA? Persecution is not just based on religion…

There are many points which need to be taken into account to consider a person a refugee or not — religion, language, class. But when a particular (law) is formulated, you cannot take all the issues together. One serious issue that people are facing has been taken into consideration at this point in time. Other reasonable classification can be made in due course. When such Acts are made, we cannot complicate it… The persecuted minorities (based on) religion are to be taken care of. It is our obligation, our moral duty, a constitutional obligation.

KRISHN KAUSHIK: BJP leaders often say that the NRC was brought in by the Congress. But that was for Assam. Why is the BJP pushing for a nationwide NRC?

This particular aspect is mentioned in their (the BJP’s) manifesto. People of this country gave them two-thirds majority on the basis of their manifesto. How can they go back on a promise they made to the public? Not just in the 2019 manifesto, it was mentioned in the 2014 manifesto as well. Also, if you look at the NRC through a non-political, national perspective, then it is specifically related to the security of the nation. That is why almost all nations have their own Register.

DEEPTIMAN TIWARY: But do you think the NRC exercise is really feasible in a country like Bharat where a large section of people have no assets or documents to prove even their date of birth?

I’m very optimistic about it. If you have an Aadhaar card, ration card, or any other identity card, then it’s well and good. But even if you have none of it, it (the law) asks you if there are three-four people who know you… So in that way, it is feasible and I am quite optimistic that it can be done.

DEEPTIMAN TIWARY: But in Assam, where the exercise was conducted, I don’t think four people testifying that you are a citizen of this nation has been enough to prove citizenship…

Let us try. We are positive about this step. Once people said that Article 370 is a sacred clause, it cannot be touched, but it was scrapped. So if there is a will, there is a way. I understand the concern of the people, but if the move helps our country prosper, if it ensures our security, then it is our duty to support it.

ABANTIKA GHOSH: There are allegations that ABVP members beat up students on the Jawaharlal Nehru University campus…

ANANTHAKRISHNAN G: Also, you come from Kerala which is not new to campus violence. In your book you have written about political violence in the state, and you have also been one of the main campaigners against what you call “redtrocity”. In that context, how do you view the violence on the JNU campus?

First of all, any violence in a university is highly condemnable. There must be no place for violence in educational centres and in student politics. As for JNU, I have heard and read a lot about it… When more than 70 CRPF jawans were massacred by Maoists in Dantewada, there were celebrations on JNU campus. Later, the infamous ‘tukde gang’ incident also happened. I heard about it through the media, I wasn’t there. There has been some agitation going on there for months… Their (protest) style has changed. Professors are being chased, the Vice-Chancellor is heckled. Students have all the right to hold a strike, but its style and nature have changed. Classrooms are closed, they have been transformed into living rooms. Is this the way to strike? They are not ready to write examinations… I think my conclusion is that a frustrated section of students from an organisation of a (certain) political leaning, on seeing that they are losing ground… These student organisations have themselves unleashed trouble in JNU. Also, as per my information, many fake photos are being published. I condemn the violence, it should not have happened, and, of course, both sides have been injured. You say ABVP students have done it but ABVP students were also taken to hospitals. One girl student has lost her memory. We have to look at things from a proper perspective, see how JNU is changing, that’s my point.

LIZ MATHEW: But why didn’t police stop the violence at JNU?

It is some sort of dereliction of duty and needs to be looked into by the authorities and the government to see if this happened or not.

SHYAMLAL YADAV: What is the mandate of the Prajna Pravah? What work does the organisation do?

In the last five-six centuries, intellectual activities by nationalist people lost momentum. Bharat is the land of knowledge but maybe, because of continuous attacks on Bharat and its educational and academic centres, the churning for knowledge creation was stalled. So, many people, not just those linked to the RSS, but also those who have a Bharatiya viewpoint, came together to delve deep into the knowledge system and tradition. That is how this movement started. So in that sense it is not a single organisation, but an umbrella organisation for intellectual movements.

After Independence, from 1950 onwards, there was planned ethnic cleansing of such thinkers, their books got sidelined. Many of you may be political science students. Have you seen a copy of Kashi Prasad Jayaswal’s Hindu Polity? Jayaswal was not an RSS person. To put my point across clearly, Jayaswal as a thought process was cleansed. Where is Acharya Prafulla Chandra Roy’s Hindu Chemistry? He wrote about the Bharatiya tradition of chemistry. So this churning has to be restarted. I have also pursued political science and we were taught about the thoughts of Karl Marx, Antonio Francesco Gramsci… Of course, all these thought processes should be taken into consideration, but why not Jayaswal’s, why not Chanakya’s?

SHYAMLAL YADAV: At the ground level, what is the relationship between the BJP and RSS shakhas? There have been some reports that at many places the numerical strength in shakhas has been declining.

RSS shakhas have no relationship with the political dispensation. Right from the beginning, the RSS is working on its own strength. If there was any such relation, the maximum number of shakhas would have been in Gujarat. The BJP has been in power in the state for the last four terms. If I say that the BJP will come to power in Kerala in the state election next year, all of you may laugh because you are well aware of the BJP’s political strength in the state. But you will be surprised to know that the maximum number of shakhas in a state are in Kerala. So, shakhas have no link to the party in power.

RAVISH TIWARI: RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat has often said that all Bharatiya are part of the Hindu society, irrespective of their religion and culture. What is the RSS’s fascination with declaring everybody a Hindu?

He didn’t insist on calling everyone a Hindu. He said this is my concept. In his Vigyan Bhawan speech (in December 2019), at the outset, he said that it (the statement) is not to convince you… Those who are living in Hindustan are Hindus. A national newspaper is called The Hindu, there are no issues over that. That particular media group came to the conclusion that our paper is Hindu. The RSS is also thinking on the same lines. Both The Bharatiya Express and The Hindu are Bharatiya, and they are both Hindu. Mohan Bhagwat uses the word Hindu as a synonym for Bharat.

When Vir Savarkar was in jail in the Andamans, suffering all sorts of criminal atrocities, he wrote thousands of poems. In one of them, he defined Hindutva. He said those who are living in this great nation, it is their punya bhumi (land of good karma), their sacred nation. Those who are born here, those who consider this the land of their ancestors, I am calling them Hindu. That’s all. I am putting my ideas before you, it is not binding for you to follow my ideas. You can accept or reject them.

ANANTHAKRISHNAN G: For several decades now the RSS has had the same structure, pattern, habits, sports. Has the RSS as an organisation failed to keep pace with the times? You took several decades to even change your uniform from shorts to trousers. Do you think there has been a delay in adapting to the times?

No, I don’t think so. When RSS shakhas were started, we adopted the most modern uniform of that time. You may look at it now and say that it was old-fashioned, but 94 years ago that was not the case. In fact, back then there was an allegation that the RSS has adopted a western uniform. And since then the uniform has also changed six times. Also, the basic concept of the RSS is to work to transform minds. Only through that can the system be transformed. We are continuing to do so through the people who come to our shakhas.

Read More
News

LokManthan Bhagyanagar 2024: Celebrate oneness of our unity

‘LokManthan Bhagyanagar 2024’, which will be Bharat’s largest colloquium, will be held in Bhagyanagar (Hyderabad) from November 21-24. It will lay stress on the fact that Bharat’s strength lies in its unity. A curtain raiser of the event was held recently at Jalavihar Bhagyanagar, the city of fortune, is planning to host “LokManthan 2024”. A curtain-raising event was held in Jalavihar on August 9. On this occasion, the reception committee was announced, a book deta detailing the event’s concept was published and a dedicated portal was made available to the public. The speakers explained the idea and concept of the upcoming big biennial event.

The intellectually stimulating event titled “LokManthan Bhagyanagar -2024: A Colloquium of Nation-First Thinkers & Practitioners,” saw the participation of scholars, retired civil servants, defence personnel, practitioners and leaders from various professions, who came together to deliberate on issues central to the unity and progress of Bharat.

The event began with the Deep Prajwalana ceremony, followed by cultural performances by artists showcasing Oggu Dolu, Dappu Dolu, Bathukamma, Potharaju, and traditional songs. The event on August 10 served as a curtain raiser for the grand programme scheduled for November 2024. The organisers also announced the reception committee for the upcoming event.

The event was presided over by Bandi Sanjay, Union Minister of State in the Ministry of Home Affairs. In his opening remarks, Bandi Sanjay emphasised the importance of fostering a collective national identity that transcends regional and cultural divisions. He highlighted the role of such discussions in shaping policies and narratives that reflect the true spirit of Bharat.

Colonialists Divided Bharatiya Society.

J Nandakumar, National Convenor of Pragna Pravah, delivered the keynote address, focusing on the theme and the reasons behind “LokManthan”. He said in recent times, we have witnessed a deliberate attempt to create artificial divisions within our society—divisions that are alien to our culture and philosophy. There is a narrative called ‘Classic’ and ‘folk’, largely influenced by Western perspectives, that seeks to label and separate our people. This narrative paints a picture where those living in rural or forested areas are seen as uncivilised, while urban dwellers are considered civilised. This is not just a distortion of facts; it is an outright denial of Bharat’s intrinsic values.

The terms “classic” and “folk” were used by colonial forces to create societal binaries, a division that persisted in Bharatiya society even after Independence, contrary to the common man’s expectations. Our ancient wisdom does not subscribe to such divisive labels. Instead, it recognises the inherent oneness that permeates all aspects of life. The distinction between the so-called civilised and uncivilised is a construct that has been propagated by certain academic circles and Left-liberal groups, aiming to weaken the very identity of our society. Our culture, our traditions, our way of life—these are all testaments to the oneness to the oneness that binds us.

Today’s event is just the beginning. It serves as a curtain raiser for the grand programme scheduled for November, where we will continue to celebrate the oneness of our society. Bharat’s strength in its unity, and through this colloquium, we shall reaffirm that strength and carry it forward.

Ancient Wisdom Will Guide Society

The guest of honour, Brahmasri Samavedam Shanmukha Sarma, founder of Rishipeetham, spoke on the significance of cultural and spiritual unity in sustaining the nation’s ethos among all people, whether they live in forests, villages, or urban areas. He elaborated on the ancient wisdom embedded in Bharatiya traditions, which can guide contemporary society in overcoming the challenges posed by modernity.

Shanmukha Sarma said as the Lokmanthan programme moves from Madhya Pradesh towards the city of Bhagyanagar, it is essential to reflect on the significance of this cultural journey. “This event represents not just a celebration of our traditions, but a deep dive into the roots of Bharatiya’s diverse cultural heritage, which has been continuously under threat from external forces, especially Western ideologies that have historically sought to impose their worldview on others.

This tragic pattern of destruction wasn’t confined to the Americas or Australia. In Bharat too, we were subjected to the introduction of foreign diseases like malaria and cholera—ailments that were subjected to the introduction of foreign diseases like malaria and cholera—ailments that were not native to our land These diseases, brought by the colonisers, wreaked havoc on our people, just as they did in other parts of the world.

Wherever these colonisers went, they refused to recognise the value of local civilisations. They dismissed these ancient cultures as worthless and unworthy of preservation. This mindset was not just an expression of arrogance; it was a kind of mental illness, a syndrome rooted in the belief that their way of life was of life was inherently superior to all others. They trampled on the existing civilisations, attempting to impose their own ways, often with devastating consequences.

Dr T Hanuman Chowdary, Chairman of Pragna Bharati and a Padma Shri awardee, emphasised the need for a united stand against divisive narratives being spread through different platforms. Announcing the Reception Committee for the upcoming grand event, he shared that it includes 108 eminent personalities. Among the distinguished names are G Kishan Reddy, Minister of Coal, Retd Justice Narasimha Reddy, Bandi Sanjay, Minister of State for Home Affairs, along with several other notable figures from diverse professional backgrounds.

“LokManthan Bhagyanagar -2024: A Colloquium of Nation-First Thinkers & Practitioners,” saw the participation of folk artists who entertained the gathering that included scholars, Arned Forces Arned Forces personnel and practitioners from various professions.

Swamini Suvidyamrita Prana of Mata Amritanandamayi Math, another esteemed guest of honour, shared insights on the spiritual dimension of unity and launched the dedicated portal of the event. At the same time, Lok Kalaakaar Shri Dasari Kondappa, a Padma Shri awardee from Telangana, highlighted the role of arts in preserving and promoting Bharatiya culture. He is the last surviving artist who can make Burraveena and render music using the same. Though coming from a remote rural background, the lyrics of his music reflect the same common wisdom of Bharat that can be seen even in so-called classical (as per Western classification) literature and philosophies.

Unity in Diversity

The colloquium served as a precursor to the larger event, LokManthan, scheduled for November 21-24, 2024. LokManthan is Bharat’s largest colloquium, celebrating the nation’s diverse yet unified This biannual event aims to dismantle the perceived artificial divisions among people from varied backgrounds, thought processes, traditions, and systems.

As the evening progressed, the speakers and participants engaged in thought-provoking discussions, underscoring the significance of such platforms in shaping a cohesive and forward-looking Bharat. The event concluded with a strong message of unity, cultural pride, and the reaffirmation of the nation-first philosophy that LokManthan stands for.

LokManthan provides a unique platform for engagement and deliberation with eminent academicians, thinkers, philosophers, researchers, artists, and activists. Through these discussions, the event seeks to establish a common understanding and approach to the divisive narratives prevalent in society. Ultimately, LokManthan aspires to evolve a new discourse that strengthens the unity of Bharatiyas, embracing diversity as a cornerstone of the nation’s identity. At the event, the organisers launched Lokmathanam: Sankalpana, a 32-page booklet outlining the theme and concept behind this celebration. Additionally, Additionally, a brochure was introduced, providing details about previous Lokmanthan events held in Bhopal 2016, Ranchi 2018, Guwahati 2022, and the upcoming event scheduled for November 2024.

The LokManthan Bhagyanagar 2024 event is supported by the following partners: Pragna Pravah, Pragna Bharati, Itihasa Sankalana Samiti, Samskara Bharati, Bharatiya Shikshan Mandal, Vijnana Bharati (Vibha), and Akhila Bharatiya Sahitya Parishad.

The media partners for the event are Hindu Darshini, HansBharat Daily, HMTV, Disha Daily, Nationalist Hub, Pura Local, and YUPPTV.

Read More
News

LokManthan Bhagyanagar 2024: A colloquium of Nation-First thinkers and practitioners

Bhagyanagar is planning to host LokManthan 2024, with a curtain-raising event held in Jalavihar. On this occasion, the reception committee was announced, a book detailing the event’s concept was announced, a book detailing the event’s concept was published, and a dedicated portal was made available to the public. The speakers explained the idea and concept of the upcoming big biennial event.

Bhagyanagar, the city of fortune, played host to an intellectually stimulating event on Saturday evening at Jalavihar, Necklace Road. The gathering, titled “LokManthan Bhagyanagar -2024: A Colloquium of Nation-First Thinkers & Practitioners,” saw a confluence of scholars, retd civil servants, defense personnel, practitioners, and leaders from various professions who came together to deliberate on issues central to the unity and progress of Bharat.

The event began with the Deep Prajwalana ceremony, followed by cultural performances by artists showcasing Oggu Dolu, Dappu Dolu, Bathukamma. Potharaju, and traditional songs. The event on August 10 served as a curtain raiser for the grand program scheduled for November 2024. The organizers also announced the reception committee for the upcoming event.

The event was presided over by Bandi Sanjay, Union Minister of State in the Ministry of Home Affairs. In his opening remarks, Bandi Sanjay emphasized the importance of fostering a collective national identity that transcends regional and cultural divisions. He highlighted the role of such discussions in shaping policies and narratives that reflect the true spirit of Bharat.

The guest of honor, Brahmasri Samavedam Shanmukha Sarma, Founder of Rishipeetham, spoke on the significance of cultural and spiritual unity in sustaining the nation’s ethos among all people, whether they live in forests, villages, or urban areas. He elaborated on the ancient wisdom embedded in Bharatiya traditions, which can guide contemporary society in overcoming the challenges posed by modernity.

J Nandakumar, the National Convenor of Pragna Pravah, delivered the keynote address, focusing on the theme and the reasons behind “LokManthan”. He said in recent times, we have witnessed a deliberate attempt to create artificial divisions within our society—divisions that are alien to our culture and philosophy. There is a narrative called ‘Classic’ and ‘folk’, largely influenced by Western perspectives, that seeks to label and separate our people. This narrative paints a picture where those living in rural or forested areas are seen as uncivilized, while urban dwellers are considered civilized. This is not just a distortion of facts; it is an outright denial of Bharat’s intrinsic values.

The terms “classic” and “folk” were used by colonial forces to create societal binaries, a division that persisted in Bharatiya society even after independence, contrary to the common man’s expectations Our ancient wisdom does not subscribe to such divisive labels. Instead, it recognizes the inherent oneness that permeates all aspects of life. The distinction between the so-called civilized and uncivilized is a construct that has been propagated by certain academic circles and left-liberal groups, aiming to weaken the very identity of our society. Our culture, our traditions, our way of life—these are all testaments to the oneness that binds us.

Today’s event is just the beginning. It serves as a curtain raiser for the grand program scheduled for November, where we will continue to celebrate the oneness of our society. Bharat’s strength lies in its unity, and through this colloquium, we shall reaffirm that strength and carry it forward.

Dr. T Hanuman Chowdary, Chairman of Pragna Bharati and a Padma Shri awardee, emphasized the need for a united stand against divisive narratives being spread through different platforms. Announcing the Reception Committee for the upcoming grand event, he shared that it includes 108 eminent personalities. Among the distinguished names are G Kishan Reddy, Minister of Coal, Retd Justice Narasimha Reddy, Bandi Sanjay, Minister of State for Home Affairs, along with several other notable figures from diverse professional backgrounds.

Swamini Suvidyamrita Prana of Mata Amritanandamayi Math, another esteemed guest of honor, shared insights on the spiritual dimension of unity and launched the dedicated portal of the event.

At the same time, Lok Kalaakaar Shri Dasari Kondappa, a Padma Shri awardee from Telangana, highlighted the role of arts in preserving and promoting Bharatiya culture. He is the last surviving artist who can make Burraveena and render music using the same. Though coming from a remote rural background, the lyrics of his music reflect the same common wisdom of Bharat that can be seen even in so-called classical (as per Western classification) literature and philosophies.

The colloquium served as a precursor to the larger event, LokManthan, scheduled for November 21-24, 2024. LokManthan is Bharat’s largest colloquium, celebrating the nation’s diverse yet unified culture. This biannual event aims to dismantle the perceived artificial divisions among people from varied backgrounds, thought processes, traditions, and systems.

As the evening progressed, the speakers and participants engaged in thought-provoking discussions, underscoring the significance of such platforms in shaping a cohesive and forward-looking Bharat. The event concluded with a strong message of unity, cultural pride, and the reaffirmation of the nation-first philosophy that LokManthan stands for.

LokManthan provides a unique platform for engagement and deliberation with eminent academicians, thinkers, philosophers, researchers, artists, and activists. Through these discussions, the event seeks to establish a common understanding and approach to the divisive narratives prevalent in society. Ultimately, LokManthan aspires to evolve a new discourse that strengthens the unity of Bharatiyas, embracing diversity as a cornerstone of the nation’s identity.

At the event, the organizers launched “Lokmathanam: Sankalpana,” a 32-page booklet outlining the theme and concept behind this celebration. Additionally, a brochure was introduced, providing details about previous Lokmanthan events held in Bhopal 2016, Ranchi 2018, Guwahati 2022, and the upcoming event scheduled for November 2024.

The LokManthan Bagyanagar 2024 event is supported by the following partners: Pragna Pravah, Pragna Bharati, Itihasa Sankalana Samiti, Samskara Bharati, Bharatiya Shikshan Mandal, Vijnana Bharati, Itihasa Sankalana Samiti, Samskara Bharati, Bharatiya Shikshan Mandal, Vijnana Bharati (Vibha), and Akhila Bharatiya Sahitya Parishad.

Read More
News

RSS-linked body urges UNHRC to deploy mission to probe atrocities against Hindus in Bangladesh

A key remit of the United Nations Human Rights Council is to promote and protect human rights around the world.

A demonstrator displays a placard during a protest against what they say is violence against Hindu communities during ongoing unrest in Dhaka, Bangladesh, August 9, 2024.

Credit: Reuters Photo New Delhi: An RSS-affiliated body has issued an appeal to the UNHRC to deploy a fact-finding mission to investigate alleged incidents of attacks against Hindu and other minorities in strife-torn Bangladesh.

A key remit of the United Nations Human Rights Council is to promote and protect human rights around the world.

Prajna Pravah, the Hindu rights body, has issued a public online link with a draft of its appeal seeking public support.

Also Read: Bangladesh launches hotline, urges people to inform about attacks on temples, other religious institutions

“We, a collective of intellectuals, academicians, lawyers and concerned citizens are writing to you as we are perturbed,” the body said in its appeal to the UNHRC.

It urged the UN body “immediately send a team to Bangladesh to assess the ground situation, interact with the victims and document the human rights violations against the Hindus and other minority communities.” Prajna Pravah has also urged the Bangladeshi authorities to “take immediate and effective measures to safeguard the lives, property and dignity of Hindu and other minorities” and also ensure that the “perpetrators of violence are brought to justice.”

It has also appealed to the UN body to “facilitate safe passage for those seeking refuge” and provide necessary humanitarian assistance.

It has also appealed to UNHRC to mobilise international support and also launch an initiative to rebuild lives of those who have lost their livelihood.

Read More
News

Tamil Nadu: Prajna Pravah National Convener J Nandakumar lists out concerns over wokeism and cultural Marxism in Bharat

In a thought-provoking address at a recent event in Chennai, Prajna Pravah National Convener and writer J Nandakumar articulated his concerns regarding wokeism and cultural Marxism in Bharat. He underscored the adverse impacts of these ideologies on the nation’s cultural and societal fabric.

In a recently organised event in Chennai, Prajna Pravah National Convener and writer J Nandakumar spoke at length about the evils and concerns over wokeism and cultural Marxism in Bharat. He recalled Azim Premji University titled “Annihilating Hinduism,” highlighting the blatant targeting of Hindu culture under the guise of academic discourse. In his speech, he dwelt at length in explaining what is wokesim and Cultural Marxism.

Nandakumar, editor of Kesari, a weekly magazine, emphasized the importance of spreading awareness about Hindutva nationwide and didn’t go away from addressing contemporary manifestations of wokeism. He also discussed how small children in schools are being encouraged to claim their pronouns and how woke theory promotes He also discussed how small children in schools are being encouraged to claim their pronouns and how woke theory promotes that gender can change in mere hours. These examples underscored the rapid and concerning spread of these ideologies, particularly among the youth. Nandakumar drew a clear line between the positive aspects of being woke – as in “awake” or aware, as exemplified in Bharatiya scriptures and Swami Vivekananda’s famous call to उत्तिष्ठत जाग्रत प्राप्य वरान्निबोधत, क्षुरासन्न धारा निशिता दुरत्यद्दुर्गम पथ: तत् कवयो वदन्ति that translates to “Arise, awake, and stop not until the goal is reached,” and the narrow-mindedness and intolerance that characterize modern wokeism.

Tracing the origins and implications of wokeism, he found its roots to classical Marxism and its evolution into cultural Marxism, which he stated targets thinkers and students through academic institutions. Nandakumar ji warned of attempts to infiltrate cultural and educational institutions to promote divisive ideologies.

Nandakumar ji raced the genesis of wokeism back to the failure of classical Marxism. He said as communism fell out of favour, which shifted focus from the working class to intellectuals and students. He then detailed how this ideology transformed into academic study materials, infiltrating fields like gender studies, anthropology, and political science. Nandakuamr said” By controlling educational curricula and media narratives, cultural Marxists aim to shape societal perceptions and values. This approach has led to the promotion of “critical consciousness” over traditional or what they term “false consciousness”.

He proposed several counter-strategies and said, “Education was highlighted as a crucial battleground, with calls to reclaim traditional educational systems (Indic knowledge systems) while blending them with modern knowledge. The establishment of new universities and the promotion of online learning platforms were suggested as ways to offer alternative perspectives”. He also advocated for economic action, encouraging the audience to boycott corporate brands involved in woke propaganda and instead support smaller and medium-sized businesses that align with traditional values

The Nandkumar said, “It’s time for those who value traditional Bharatiya culture and social harmony to stand up, speak out, and actively work to preserve our heritage while addressing genuine social issues in a balanced and constructive manner. Only through such concerted efforts can we, as the Hindu Samaj, hope to counter the tide of wokeism and cultural Marxism and build a truly society that is respectful of diverse viewpoints and grounded in the timeless principles of Bharatiya civilisation.

He said, “Cultural Marxism thrives on societal anarchy, using chaos as a springboard for political takeover. This strategy directly impacts Bharatiya traditions and culture, systematically undermining family values and eroding trust in societal institutions. As he explained, the ultimate goal is destroying a society’s culture, language, nature, and traditions.”

VIGIL organised this event on June 23, 2024 in Chennai with an objective of spreading pro-Bharat thoughts and fostering nationalism. VIGIL team’s convener, Sathyanarayan, opened the seminar by introducing VIGIL and the work it had done in the past and its transformation over the years. The organization aims to counter anti-Bharat narratives on social media and promote nationalism through various initiatives, including speeches and book launches.

Read More
News

Prajna Pravah and GIA appeal UNHRC intervention amid escalating anti-Hindu violence in Bangladesh

Amid rising violence against Hindus and minorities in Bangladesh, Prajna Pravah and the Group of Academicians and Intellectuals (GIA) have urgently appealed to the UNHRC for intervention, highlighting.

A collective of intellectuals, academics, lawyers, and concerned citizens, under the banner of Prajna Pravah and the Group of Academicians and Intellectuals (GIA), has written to the United Nations Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), calling for urgent intervention in Bangladesh. The letter draws attention to an escalating wave of violence targeting Hindus and other minorities, allegedly driven by Islamic extremists under the guise of an anti-reservation movement.

Increasing Persecution Amid Political Instability

The letter, signed by prominent figures from various fields, expresses deep concern over the escalating persecution of Hindus and other minority communities in Bangladesh. The signatories argue that that the political instability following a recent military coup on August 6, 2024, has exacerbated existing discrimination, leading to widespread chaos and violence across the country.

Sheikh Hasina, the Prime Minister of Bangladesh, was reportedly forced to leave the country following the coup. The coup was preceded by a series of violent street protests against a public policy, which has since spiralled into a larger wave of unrest. The letter points out that this political vacuum has resulted in an alarming increase in violence, with opposition members and minorities being particularly vulnerable.

Brutal Attacks and Mass Exodus

Reports emerging from Bangladesh paint a grim picture of the situation on the ground. The letter references multiple sources, including Bharatiya and international media, to underscore the severity of the attacks. Many Hindu and other minority men, women, and children have been subjected to brutal assaults, with several cases of murders creating an atmosphere of fear and insecurity.

Additionally, there are reports of Hindu women being subjected to atrocities as part of a broader campaign of terror aimed at forcing minorities into submission or migration.

The continuous persecution has led to a mass exodus of Hindu families from Bangladesh. It is estimated that over 1.5 million Hindu and other minority refugees, including men, women, children, and the elderly, are attempting to seek refuge in Bharat.

Demographics: A Stark Decline

The letter also highlights the stark demographic changes in Bangladesh, which have left minority communities increasingly vulnerable. According to the 2022 national census, Muslims constitute about 91 per cent of the population, while Hindus make up roughly 8 per cent, with other minorities comprising just 1 per cent. This marks a shift from the 2011 census, where Muslims were recorded at 89 per cent and Hindus at 10 per cent. The plight of other minorities remains similarly dire, with their numbers also declining over the years.

A Plea for International Action

In response to these alarming developments, the intellectuals have made a series of appeals to the UNHRC. They have urged the Council to send a fact-finding mission to Bangladesh to assess the ground situation, interact with victims, and document the human rights violations against Hindu and other minority communities. The letter also calls for the UNHRC to engage with the Bangladesh government, pressing them to take immediate and effective measures to protect the lives, property, and dignity of minorities.

Furthermore, the signatories have called for the facilitation of safe passage for those seeking refuge and the provision of necessary humanitarian assistance. They have also emphasised the need for international intervention to pressure the Bangladesh government to uphold human rights and protect its minority populations.

Long-Term Solutions

Beyond immediate relief, the intellectuals advocate for long-term strategies to ensure the protection of Hindus and other minorities in Bangladesh. These include legal reforms, enhanced security measures, and community support initiatives aimed at rebuilding the lives of those who have lost their livelihoods. The letter underscores that the minority communities in Bangladesh are facing an existential crisis and that immediate action from the UNHRC is essential to prevent further atrocities.

The letter concludes with a strong plea for the UNHRC to take urgent and decisive action to address this grave humanitarian crisis. The signatories express hope that the Council will respond swiftly to prevent further violence and ensure the safety and dignity of the minority communities in Bangladesh.

Sign the Appeal Here

This collective appeal by intellectuals, academics, lawyers, and concerned citizens reflects the gravity of the situation in Bangladesh and underscores the urgent need for international intervention to protect vulnerable minority communities from further harm.

Those who wish to sign the letter can find the link here:

https://organiser.org/2024/08/13/251571/bharat/lawyers-intellectuals-and-academics-urge-unhrc-intervention-amid-escalating-violence-against-hindus-in-bangladesh/

Read More