News

“Rejecting the Colonial Narrative of North-South Divide is our National Duty”: J Nandakumar

I’m optimistic about NRC. If you have Aadhaar, ration card, or any other I-card, it’s well and good: J Nandakumar
Recently, Kesari Weekly and Prajna Pravah came together to organise a full-day conclave called Bridging South. What was the intent behind this? And how should we see the entire debate? Organiser Editor Prafulla Ketkar in conversation with J Nandakumar, National Convener, Prajna Pravah on the North-South Divide

In recent days, there have been many discussions about, the southern part of Bharat, whether it is different from the northern part, politically, economically and otherwise. And though the discussion is not new, it has got a new twist post-elections. Just before that, there was a conference in Kerala called “Cutting South” and with the support of some Canadian institutions there, since then, has been a discussion about the United States of South Bhart and how the South is different from the North.

It’s actually when we are talking about bridging south, I would like to translate it in a different way that it is to say Setu Himachal itself means bridging the north to south. From time immemorial Bharat is described as the country that lies north of the ocean, and south of the snowy mountains, for there dwelt the descendants of Bharat. From Himalaya to Hindu Maha Sagar. That is Bharat’s two boundaries and it has not been told only by someone who is living in the northern part of Bharat, but the whole part, especially from the South. This description is in ancient scriptures of Malayalam, Tamil, Telugu, and Kannada everywhere.

But we are also aware of those colonial masters, especially the English people who ruled us and how they tried to divide, tried to make a divide between North and South. They always believed in divide and then rule and that notorious and divisive poisonous action taken by English people is shamelessly replicated by Bharatiya Governments or the political parties who do not believe in the cultural unity and integrity of Bharat. This is also being followed by many of the congress leaders. Earlier Mahatma Gandhiji, Lokmanya Tilak and Baba Saheb Ambedkar, all firmly believed that Bharat was one. Baba Saheb Ambedkar presented a wonderful statement on the integrity of Bharat at Columbia University in 1916. He said that Bharat was not a geographical unity alone. It’s an indisputable cultural unity from end to end. And about Bhagwan Ram’s effort to bridge the North and South; Sri Krishna’s efforts to connect the East to the West and how Bhagwan Shiva is in every grain of Bharat. We had political unity too as seen in the Chola Dynasty, and Maurya Dynasty, under the rules of Asoka and Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj. But the ultimate thing was always cultural unity. But the congres leaders, who are against the Gandhian principles or those of Tilak and Lal Shastri don’t believe in this cultural unity.

Another group of people who have succumbed to the divisive policy are leftists. They started this type of narrative and recently its ugly face has come to the fore. That’s what happened in this confer.

“From Himalaya to Hindu Maha Sagar. That is Bharat’s two boundaries and it has not been told only by someone who is living in the northern part of Bharat, but the whole part, especially from the South”

Both of them come together to prove that the southern part of Bharat was never a part of Bharat and it is something different. And along with that, they have put forward so many fake narratives regarding the central neglecting South, and how most of the revenue is collected from the South and no development is not going on there.

But now because of this fake narrative forcefully pushed it is our duty or national duty that we must come together and tell the world how Bharat is one, how the South is connected to Bharat, how the South is connected to Bharat, how the greatest personalities like Shankaracharya and all tried for the unity of Bharat.

That’s why Prajna Pravah, Kesari Daily and others decided to put together this conclave titled Bridging South or Setu Himachal.

Initially when it started during the colonial period, as you mentioned, it was mainly around linguistic differentiation between Dravidian languages and Indo-Aryan languages. And we have seen a strong linguistic nationalism in Tamil Nadu. But what we see now, like in the 1960s sixties, sentiments being raised for political ends. Of course, fortunately, they didn’t get much traction among common people and we managed to maintain our unity and integrity. But what we are seeing now is much more poisonous because we know all for sure that there will be you know, census followed by delimitation, and GST-related issues. So, the discussion is being raised around this idea of cooperating federalism. So how should we see all this?

See our diversity was not made of opposing factors, but mutually complementary ones. So what we are seeing in this great land of thousands and thousands of years of history is a multi-layered culture This is not a multicultural, it is a multi-layered culture. That is the speciality of Bharat. Those who believe in Western material thought or ideology, could not comprehend this multi-layered nature of Bharat or Bharat’s culture. They are just saying this, this is multicultural and see, for example, there are different languages. How can Bharat’s language be so different? Because it is a language be so different? Because it is a language continuum, the whole Bharat. From the Kanya Kumari to Kashmir. All languages are part of one single family through linguistic basic definitions, if you go through the science of language. For example, when you are constructing a sentence, there is a subject-object and a verb. This is the same pattern, common to all Bhartiya languages. Also, the words from Malayalam to what you say Hindi or Kashmiri or any other language have similarities in words.

I would like to say one is the languages we are using for our interview is English and another one is Urdu. This is in one way or another, the purity of our languages has been adulterated or intervened by these two language influences. This type was created by the colonial masters, right from the beginning, when they wanted to create that division, they wanted some basis and they started saying that this language families are different on that basis.

They created the Aryan-Dravidian division and to support they want more divisions so that they have through their census.

And today we are seeing just the repeating of those divisive measures created by the colonial British Masters, by the parties or the ideologies which do not believe in Bharat’s ancient nature, cultura unity, and cultural integrity. They want to divide, as they know that a United Bharat cannot be ruled by them, they cannot comprehend it as a whole. So, they want to create this division and they thinking that if “Nagaland Mange Azadi”, “Kerala Mange Azadi”, “Kerala is different from Nagaland” and the so-called mainland of Bharat, they can rule it forever and they can become the Chakravortis of that land but they are in a fool’s paradise.

Recently, they have started a new game –this census issue and all and I’m not a political expert but one thing is for sure, the recent five assembly elections have given a thrashing to these narratives. But we have heard how Martin Luther King Jr also said that it is not because of the bad people’s number, they are they are in the minority, that they make more noise, but because the good people remain silent.

See this integrationist view of Bharat as a counter to the divisive view that has been there even during the freedom Struggle and in the last 75 years. But if we see the present generation, the youth who are educated in the present system, and not much connected to our roots in day-to-day life, they see this reality that there is a lot of migration from the northern part to the south. How should we explain reality related to economics and migration development, so-called development parameters and then engage with the youth from the integration point of view?
See it’s a fact that from the north, especially from Bihar and the eastern part of Bharat, many job seekers are coming to the south, especially to Kerala. But the same thing is true of many metros of Bharat –Delhi, Mumbai, Ahmedabad—they are full of people from the South.

Or go to Gulf countries, the maximum number of people who are doing so many ordinary jobs are from Kerala. So, it is a fact this type of mutual migration is there and because of the trade union aspect and the hike of the day-to-day salary, Kerala attracts a lot more labour. That’s why you know that this type of trade unionism in agriculture and industry has badly affected Kerala. If you analyse it economically, there is no new industry in Kerala. The staple food of rice is not being cultivated in Kerala. The Keralites depend on the rice cultivated by the Andhra people. Kerala people are celebrating at the expense of Tamils who are cultivating flowers. Why is it happening? So because of this militant trade unionism put forward by or led by these communist people and shamelessly followed by the Kerala trade unionists because they want to fight with them. So, they also demanded much more. And because of that one thing, one thing happened there in.

Kerala, new industry is not coming. Agriculture has been destroyed.

One factory is there the remaining industry or the construction works for the construction work and all the daily labour charges or the salary is high. Bihari people or Bengal people, are seeing that Kerala is their girl because they are getting more salary. But the mentality of the ordinary people who are living there in Kerala is not ready to do this type of work. They do the very same work in the Gulf, they do the very same work in Gujarat. So another thing, the so-called analysts or the so-called great, what do you say of the North or the other area or the leftist? They are just to pick and choose.

Only when just after this election, I came across one of the great leftist journalist’s analyses about the per capita income of Kerala and the per capita income of Bihar. I am just asking why don’t you compare it with Haryana or Gujarat? The correct picture has to be put in front of the youth.

And there has been a history to it because compared to the north the southern states didn’t experience that kind of Islamic invasion for such a long period. The Southern part experienced the European invasion in an earlier phase, but compared to that the eastern part has seen the British rule for a longer period. So all these factors have contributed to post-independent Bharatiya’s development scenario.

But another aspect is the involvement of the academia, all of sudden certain maps are coming out, certain theories coming out, and certain people even sitting in European academia working on the idea of the so-called United States of South Bharat. So it is not just about programs. It is the strong academia and media that support this kind of narrative which leads to this kind of divide.

So, is there any plan to take up research, and academic work from this integration point of view, on how we have been culturally the same?

That’s also needed. It’s the need of the hour. I would like to say one thing just to analyse after one election because some result came out against some particular party, we can’t come to just any conclusion. It is a knee-jerk reaction. A knee-jerk reaction from the parties who are against this unity of Bharat. That’s why they are trying to create such fake narratives. Another aspect is that a United Bharat, especially for the last 9-10 years, which is progressing like anything in the economic field and even the cultural aspect through Shri Ram Janmbhoomi etc. is making people nervous.

“Many nations are considering Bharat as their potential leader. the so-called developed nations including China are very much afraid of this type of progress and development happening in Bharat and they want to divide Bharat and make it weak”

Prajna Pravah is taking it seriously, not only inside Bharat, we are now trying to create an atmosphere all over the world, at universities also in the coming times. A huge outreach program has also the Bharatiya knowledge system aspect is being given much importance. We have to have more such programs along with proper rigorous research, content generation and outreach programs.

Now there seems to be another dimension which is very critical politically that has been added to this entire discourse that sees South Bharatiya as free of Hindutva and anti-Sanatan.

This is very interesting because most of the Sanatan traditions, temples, and temple architecture are all in the south of Bharatiya. Besides this of course the political arguments over it – how BJP has some vote share or whether RSS has any presence in Tamil Nadu or not.

See just to go through the history of Bharat. In the southern part of Bharat, of course, the colonial invasion happened first in the South, but in the later period, the South never faced such a great onslaught as the eastern part of the Bharata faced. Of course, the Islamic invasion also happened in the North, especially the Northwest area, especially later on a whole part of the North.

I think my conclusion regarding this religious belief as far as you have mentioned is a Dharma concept, I would like to say the religious aspect of Hindutva is very strong in Bharat and the South personally. That’s why in Sabarimala or Tirupati, lots of people are conve converging together. But maybe my inference or conclusion is that the North because of these continuous attacks, developed the nationalist aspect of Hindutva strongly in the North.

Also looking back, we never supported dictatorship, but it happened in Bharat from 1975 to 77. But against that politically, everyone fought, but, Kerala, which is being posed as the most illiterate politically aware and liberal society, voted maximum to that dictator after an emergency.

My point is that yes, Dharma at the personal level or the religious framework, is very strong in the south, but as far as the nationalist spirit is concerned, in the north of Bharat one can see it more.

So again, during the Ram Janambhoomi agitation, even though it had a religious fervour the North also saw Rama as a nationalist leader and the agitation as a Rama versus Babur –an evil foreign invader thing. Also, one can’t say that the North is becoming more saffron and the South is less. That aspect is also not correct. That all keeps changing.

And change is happening…the people of the South are also understanding the comprehensive meaning of Hindutva.

Read More
News

LokManthan Bhagyanagar 2024: A colloquium of Nation-First thinkers and practitioners

Bhagyanagar is planning to host LokManthan 2024, with a curtain-raising event held in Jalavihar. On this occasion, the reception committee was announced, a book detailing the event’s concept was announced, a book detailing the event’s concept was published, and a dedicated portal was made available to the public. The speakers explained the idea and concept of the upcoming big biennial event.

Bhagyanagar, the city of fortune, played host to an intellectually stimulating event on Saturday evening at Jalavihar, Necklace Road. The gathering, titled “LokManthan Bhagyanagar -2024: A Colloquium of Nation-First Thinkers & Practitioners,” saw a confluence of scholars, retd civil servants, defense personnel, practitioners, and leaders from various professions who came together to deliberate on issues central to the unity and progress of Bharat.

The event began with the Deep Prajwalana ceremony, followed by cultural performances by artists showcasing Oggu Dolu, Dappu Dolu, Bathukamma. Potharaju, and traditional songs. The event on August 10 served as a curtain raiser for the grand program scheduled for November 2024. The organizers also announced the reception committee for the upcoming event.

The event was presided over by Bandi Sanjay, Union Minister of State in the Ministry of Home Affairs. In his opening remarks, Bandi Sanjay emphasized the importance of fostering a collective national identity that transcends regional and cultural divisions. He highlighted the role of such discussions in shaping policies and narratives that reflect the true spirit of Bharat.

The guest of honor, Brahmasri Samavedam Shanmukha Sarma, Founder of Rishipeetham, spoke on the significance of cultural and spiritual unity in sustaining the nation’s ethos among all people, whether they live in forests, villages, or urban areas. He elaborated on the ancient wisdom embedded in Bharatiya traditions, which can guide contemporary society in overcoming the challenges posed by modernity.

J Nandakumar, the National Convenor of Pragna Pravah, delivered the keynote address, focusing on the theme and the reasons behind “LokManthan”. He said in recent times, we have witnessed a deliberate attempt to create artificial divisions within our society—divisions that are alien to our culture and philosophy. There is a narrative called ‘Classic’ and ‘folk’, largely influenced by Western perspectives, that seeks to label and separate our people. This narrative paints a picture where those living in rural or forested areas are seen as uncivilized, while urban dwellers are considered civilized. This is not just a distortion of facts; it is an outright denial of Bharat’s intrinsic values.

The terms “classic” and “folk” were used by colonial forces to create societal binaries, a division that persisted in Bharatiya society even after independence, contrary to the common man’s expectations Our ancient wisdom does not subscribe to such divisive labels. Instead, it recognizes the inherent oneness that permeates all aspects of life. The distinction between the so-called civilized and uncivilized is a construct that has been propagated by certain academic circles and left-liberal groups, aiming to weaken the very identity of our society. Our culture, our traditions, our way of life—these are all testaments to the oneness that binds us.

Today’s event is just the beginning. It serves as a curtain raiser for the grand program scheduled for November, where we will continue to celebrate the oneness of our society. Bharat’s strength lies in its unity, and through this colloquium, we shall reaffirm that strength and carry it forward.

Dr. T Hanuman Chowdary, Chairman of Pragna Bharati and a Padma Shri awardee, emphasized the need for a united stand against divisive narratives being spread through different platforms. Announcing the Reception Committee for the upcoming grand event, he shared that it includes 108 eminent personalities. Among the distinguished names are G Kishan Reddy, Minister of Coal, Retd Justice Narasimha Reddy, Bandi Sanjay, Minister of State for Home Affairs, along with several other notable figures from diverse professional backgrounds.

Swamini Suvidyamrita Prana of Mata Amritanandamayi Math, another esteemed guest of honor, shared insights on the spiritual dimension of unity and launched the dedicated portal of the event.

At the same time, Lok Kalaakaar Shri Dasari Kondappa, a Padma Shri awardee from Telangana, highlighted the role of arts in preserving and promoting Bharatiya culture. He is the last surviving artist who can make Burraveena and render music using the same. Though coming from a remote rural background, the lyrics of his music reflect the same common wisdom of Bharat that can be seen even in so-called classical (as per Western classification) literature and philosophies.

The colloquium served as a precursor to the larger event, LokManthan, scheduled for November 21-24, 2024. LokManthan is Bharat’s largest colloquium, celebrating the nation’s diverse yet unified culture. This biannual event aims to dismantle the perceived artificial divisions among people from varied backgrounds, thought processes, traditions, and systems.

As the evening progressed, the speakers and participants engaged in thought-provoking discussions, underscoring the significance of such platforms in shaping a cohesive and forward-looking Bharat. The event concluded with a strong message of unity, cultural pride, and the reaffirmation of the nation-first philosophy that LokManthan stands for.

LokManthan provides a unique platform for engagement and deliberation with eminent academicians, thinkers, philosophers, researchers, artists, and activists. Through these discussions, the event seeks to establish a common understanding and approach to the divisive narratives prevalent in society. Ultimately, LokManthan aspires to evolve a new discourse that strengthens the unity of Bharatiyas, embracing diversity as a cornerstone of the nation’s identity.

At the event, the organizers launched “Lokmathanam: Sankalpana,” a 32-page booklet outlining the theme and concept behind this celebration. Additionally, a brochure was introduced, providing details about previous Lokmanthan events held in Bhopal 2016, Ranchi 2018, Guwahati 2022, and the upcoming event scheduled for November 2024.

The LokManthan Bagyanagar 2024 event is supported by the following partners: Pragna Pravah, Pragna Bharati, Itihasa Sankalana Samiti, Samskara Bharati, Bharatiya Shikshan Mandal, Vijnana Bharati, Itihasa Sankalana Samiti, Samskara Bharati, Bharatiya Shikshan Mandal, Vijnana Bharati (Vibha), and Akhila Bharatiya Sahitya Parishad.

Read More
Articles

Lokmanthan 2018: Inaugural event Highlights

The Prajna Pravah will organise the second edition of Lokmanthan, a biennial brainstorming for nationalist thinkers and practitioners, in Ranchi, the capital city of Jharkhand. With a view of reviving Bharatiyata and Bharatiya value system and discussing “the idea of Bharat”, the three-day national convention will be held at Hotwar’s mega sports complex from September 28, said Shri J Nandakumar, the national convener of Prajna Pravah. He was addressing the media in the inauguration programme of the Lokmanthan 2018 office of Prajna Pravah in Ranchi on May 8.

Jharkhand Chief Minister Shri Raghubar Das and Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh Sah Sarkaryavah Shri Dattatreya Hosabale inaugurated the office of the event at Nivaranpur in Doranda. “To make Bharat world guru again, it is necessary to promote our thousands of years’ old culture, civilisation and language, said Chief Minister Raghubar Das in the programme. “Bharat is created by sages, literature and art lovers. We have to bring our civilisation and culture to the masses. The State Government and its people will cooperate in Lokmanthan programme to be held in September. The Jharkhand Government is working in this direction,” he added.

“A reception committee with chief minister Raghubar Das as patron and an organising committee chaired by state art and culture minister Amar Kumar Bauri have already been formed for the purpose,” Nandakumar told the media. Rich Bharatiya values and culture that suffered severe jolts following repeated foreign invasions over centuries and were nearly crushed during the British rule needed to be revived. The ideal time for their revival was immediately after Independence, he added.

Speaking on the objectives of the mega event, Shri Nandakumar said that they were not against scientific discoveries or innovative ideas but advocated academic vigour directed towards “decolonising the Bharatiya mindset from Eurocentric impact”.

Speaking to Organiser, Shri Nandakumar said, “Lokmanthan 2018 is intended to provide an ideological platform for multi-layered discussions on topics from arts to environment. We will have representatives from all strata of the society.”

Prajna Pravah is a rational umbrella that stimulates, trains and synthesises individuals to recognise the inherent strength of Bharat. The first edition of Lok Manthan was organised by Prajna Pravah in Bhopal in November 2016. The proceedings of the Bhopal Lokmanthan were released in volumes in 2017. “While we discussed Desh-Kaal-Sthiti (the country’s contemporary situation) in the Bhopal meet, in Ranchi we will mull Bharatbodh: Jan-Gan-Man (the idea of Bharat: nation-society-mind),” he said.

Read More
Articles

‘Dialogue leads to clarity of vision’ – J Nandakumar

Perpetual churning is the very basis of Bharatiya philosophy.  Healthy discussion and creative dialogue have played a great role in the progress of this great nation. Distinctiveness of our knowledge- tradition is marked by its unique nature of imparting wisdom. It was neither a one- way affair nor a two- way lane. Yes, the mode and form of Bharatiya communication has always been multifaceted. The whole society takes part in it; not only that, the nature too is taken into the consideration. Hence, our style of Samvaad is comprehensive, and to understand it properly, we’ve to see and feel it in its totality.

Another important aspect of our Samvaad tradition is the concept about its utility or the end result. Our ancient and modern Rishis have always stated it categorically that ‘this is not merely for the sake of debate, scoring a point, or winning at any cost, but for knowing and let to be known’. This win-win factor is to be taken into consideration whenever we think about the rich Knowledge- tradition of Bharat.

Great thinker and writer Fred Dallmayr had categorically observed the strength of Bharateeya method of dialogue. Without mincing his words, while comparing western cosmopolitan ideas with classical Bharatiya method of interaction, he showed the way to west how it should cleanse cosmopolitanism of traces of imperialism and unilateral hegemony. He says, ” This effort is likely to be more promising of success if it can find parallels in non western traditions. Such traces can be found in the classical Bharatiya notion of the universal Brahman”. Another significant observation is about a different and healthier relationship between humanity and nature goes like this; “I argue in favour of a differentiated wholeness or holism, a wholeness which neither smothers distinctions in a totalising oneness nor separates or divorces them from each other. Such an outlook can find considerable support in Asian traditions of thought, especially in the Upanshidic notion of ‘Brahman’, the Bharatiya philosophy of Advaita Vedanta.” (Return to Nature)

As it has been mentioned in the beginning, our intellectual deliberations or Manthan (Churning) has always been a societal phenomenon. In that sense, Lokmanthan has an indomitable relevance. This will be the Colloquium of those who think, and act accordingly. True representatives of our society are going to ponder over the nation and the issues that it is faced with. The simplest and the most meaningful definition of a nation is, ‘A nation is a group people having common characteristics like culture, custom, lifestyle, and belief -system attributed to it’. As far as our nation is concerned, it is completely true. We have been one neither because of any totalitarian ruler, nor because of any Constitution or any common language. We were and are on, because we are a people having a common culture, tradition and custom. This commonality of our culture is manifested in the life of our ordinary people. Dr Ambedkar had stated it succinctly in his book, ‘Caste in Bharat’: “It is the unity of culture that is the basis of homogeneity. Taking this for granted, I venture to say that there is no country that can rival Bharatiya peninsula with respect to the unity of its culture. It has not only a geographical unity, but it has over and above all a deeper and a much more fundamental unity- the indubitable cultural unity that covers the land from end to end”.

Beauty and strength of this ‘Indubitable cultural unity’ is that it reflects in each and every facet of our National life. Right from the mundane, secular matters to the lofty spiritual aspects, the underlying oneness can be felt.  The uniqueness of our eternal Bharatiya spirit can be experienced from our attitude towards the environment, to the concept of sublimation and final emancipation of human life. In the songs sung by farmers, while sowing seeds and gathering yields in their fields, in the rhythms of the marching soldiers, and everywhere one can perceive the pulse of the nation clearly. Hence sister Nivedita said in her seminal work, “The web of Bharatiya life: “Eating and bathing- with us chiefly selfish operations- are here great sacramental acts, guarded at all points by social honour and the passion of purity.”

So is the case of literature, drama, music, festivals, celebrations and everything else. Only thing, we need vision to find the unifying factors. It is not all that easy to find out the subtlest ingredients which bind us together, the cementing force that strengthens us. For that clarity of vision and intellectual churning are necessary. Here comes the importance of Lokmanthan. Here, in this colloquium, from top level intellectuals to down to earth practitioners, we are coming together. Philosophers and artists are putting their heads together to find out the ways and means to empower the society. Scientists and artisans are going to live under one roof to ponder over our country and her future, our times and our condition. In that way, it would be an unique experiment.

Along with the aforesaid aspects of our intrinsic strength that keep us united, there are the divisive forces working overtime to debilitate the Nation. We’ve to be aware of those dangerous trends growing in our society. Mainly, two segments are active in the disintegrating exercise. First one is the continuing effect of the colonisation that derailed our crucial intellectual system. As Dr Kottari had said in his Educational Commission report, the centre of gravity of our education has been shifted towards Europe. The main task of our educationists is to bring back it into our nation and make it Bharat-centric. But the strangest part of the whole story is, after 70 years of our independent life, we are still in search of a True national educational policy. See the force and impact of the colonial mindset in the most crucial area of our national life, the education. No need to elaborate much about other fields like history, social sciences, art, literature and Jurisprudence, etc. So it is our duty as well as moral obligation to search for a way out and formulate the modus operandi to decolonise the Bharatiya minds.

Next one is the divisive ideology and activities of the forces, the votaries of the outdated class struggle theology. They are well versed in unearthing our differences and constructing fault lines between the so-called classes. It is not a difficult task to point out the outward differences among men. Colour, body structure, dress, language, place of stay and birth cannot be same. But these Marxian theologians, posing themselves as great intellectuals, are trying to derive sadistic pleasure by raking up these flimsy and trivial matters.  They are trying to create chaos and confusion in the society through an ideology that is defective in theory and dangerous in practice. Further, they have no love lost for Bharat. For them, Bharat is not a single nation, but a conglomeration of many different nationalities. And Stalin, from whom Bharatiya Communists drew inspiration during his lifetime, and even later, wrote in 1925: “Nowadays Bharat is spoken of as a single whole. Yet there can be hardly any doubt that in the case of a revolutionary upheaval in Bharat many hitherto unknown nationalities, each with its own language and its own distinctive culture, will emerge on the scene. And the part played by the Bharatiya Communists during the Chinese aggression against Bharat in 1962, is still vivid in our memory.

We believe in the philosophy of integration, not collision. We do follow the path of expansion, not contraction. Through every endeavour of our life, especially in the matter of intellectual deliberations, we are striving to expand our universe of existence. In that strenuous exercise our traditional habit is to surpass all sorts of little identities and merge with the larger identity. This is our age- old method of self- improvement and the way of liberation. In this Vichar Vimarsh we’re discussing these aspects in their minute details.

We, as a nation, are passing through a crucial period in the history of mankind. We’ve already turned into a nation of youngsters. Even otherwise, our nation is ancient and, at the same time, ever youthful. This large youth population is going to determine the destiny of our nation and, no doubt, of the world, too. When I say, the world too, it is not out of any narcissist tendency, and the words of the British historian, Arnold Toynbee, bear ample testimony to what I have said. He said: “So now we turn to Bharat. This spiritual gift, that makes a man human, is still alive in Bharatiya souls. Go on giving the world the Bharatiya examples of it. Nothing else can do so much to help mankind to save itself from destruction. There may or may not be one single absolute truth and only one single ultimate way of salvation. We do not know. But we do know that there are more approaches to truth than one, and more means to salvation than one. This is a hard saying for adherents of the higher religions of the Judaic family (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) but it is a truism for Hindus. The spirit of mutual goodwill, esteem, and veritable love … is the traditional spirit of the religions of the Bharatiya family. This is one of Bharatiya’s gifts to the world.”

The most inspiring part of this development is its inspirational and aspirational nature. Our youngsters are enthusiastic, confidant and industrious. They are the hope of our future. The need of the hour is to anchor their bubbling enthusiasm on the bedrock of our eternal and time-tested philosophy. They have to be saved from the confusions brought about by the divisive forces. It doesn’t mean that something alien to their intellectual makeup is going to be imposed on them. Lokmanthan is to provide them a platform to think about themselves and their surroundings. It is giving them an opportunity to find out the means for the integral development of the nation and theirs too. Hence the focus and target of this whole exercise is certainly our enthusiastic youth who are brimming with inspiration as well as aspirations of the highest degree.

In short, Lokmanthan, a Colloquium of ‘Nation First’ Thinkers and Practitioners is a public discourse platform to share, brainstorm and perorate on contemporary issues of the country that not only influences home but also the world. ‘Confluence of evolving nationalism, aspirations, social justice and harmony through empathy and sensitization culminating into social mobility using development as an instrument’ is the moving Mantra of the national convention. Four main subjects will be discussed in the Lokmanthan. Each plenary session will be followed with six parallel sessions. Along with that two topics are selected for panel discussions.

  1. Healthy life and holistic life style.
  2. Vox Populi. People in Democracy: Role & Status-

Several open stages are provided for the artists to showcase their genius. Cultural programs like Kathakali, Kalari, Tayambaka, BharatNatyam, Drama will be performed in the night.

Plenary sessions are as follows:

  1. Decolonizing Bharatiya MindsRulers from alien civilizations like the Mughals and British represented an alien ethos. By deliberate design, the British created an elite class who developed a taste and temperament closer to Europe during their stay of more than one and half century in the Bharatiya subcontinent. They presumed a superiority of European culture and introduced an education system whose purpose was to disconnect the Bharatiya people from their own roots, inhibiting the confidence in oneself and one’s culture and civilization. This was the advent of intellectual slavery in Bharat. Even after political independence, the stranglehold of the colonial intellectual tradition continued, as is obvious in our social life, art, literature and also in the country’s political structures.The first plenary session intends to review the dominance of the colonial influence and intellectual traditions on our mind and thinking. The contrived ideas of foreign lands will lead to influenced social life and culture, destroying the concept of diversity of this civilization and cement the skepticism towards our identity. No country or culture can play any meaningful role with a slave mentality. There is need to interweave confidence in Bharatiya knowledge system and dismantle the colonized attitudes, behaviour and their side effects.
  2. Rashtriyata (Nationality) in Neo-liberalism andGlobalization EraAlthough the idea of nation is presented as a modern concept, its core of cultural belongingness is as old as human civilization. The long process of commonality and kinship ultimately got crystallized in the form of a nation and nationalism across the world.The on-set of neo-liberal globalization presumably mounted an assault on any such long lasting bond. However, juxtaposing the idea of nationalism and neo-liberal globalization championing a borderless world raises many debatable arguments. The recent example of Brexit exhibits that neo-liberal imperatives have made people acutely conscious of their nationalism. However, some thinkers argue that nationalists could employ neo-liberal policies for nationalist reasons. Can commercialization and economics uproot the sentiments of national identity or co-exist, is the question to be addressed.
  3. Identity, Aspirations and National IntegrationEvery society and nation has its own way of progress. When things change, thinking evolves, new social and cultural understanding develops, conflict and comparisons with past becomes very natural. New experience and accordingly our behaviour pattern could be coined as modern which is not necessarily rejection of past. Modernity is a reflection of continuity with change. Experimentation is human nature and it is this characteristic which invites changes in our social, cultural and behaviour patterns. Art, music, literature, tradition and pattern of knowledge all are impacted and influenced by mutual interactions. It’s a sign of an open, progressive and democratic society. Interactions, influences and exchange of ideas impact our aspirations from self, society and nation. However, awareness of a commonality in our identities and aspirations gives direction and meaning to our togetherness as a nation. An introspection to identify our identity, aspirations and connect to our roots vis-à-vis the psychological and physical impact of the West needs discussion and deliberation.
  4. Role of Art, Culture, History and Media in Nation Buildingbharat has a rich tradition of diversities. It is not confined only to the field of social life but also extends to culture. Our concept of diversity is not in conformity with the Western idea of diversity. There, it is considered in terms of identity and every cultural current, dialect, language, social variations, sects, and diverse philosophies are perceived as a counter- narrative of unity. However, Bharatiya culture replete with diversities is the foundation of her evolution, contestation and variations which are as natural as blowing of wind and flowing of water.To celebrate these diversities without binding them in identity, to strengthen national integration and idea of Bharat is a challenge before the thinkers of the country. Incepting manipulated traits and traditions into social, cultural, religious realms of over past few centuries of history, Western philosophy and propagation of those beliefs by animated intellectuals has germinated the politics of identity that is proving to be detrimental to the core idea of unity in diversity. The natural consequence of this offered space to reactionary forces on one hand and status quoist elements of feudal mindset on the other has lackluster the concept of cultural civilization over the years. Bringing back the natural and deserving of our old civilization is therefore a task before thought leaders, social activists, and intellectuals of the country through their influence in all walks of life including art, folk, literature and religious faiths.
Read More